Anarchy and Empire: World-Conquerors and International Systems
- Date：Tue, Oct 15, 2024
- Time：10:00-11:30
- Location：Room549, the 5th floor of the Akamon General Research Building (held in person)
MAP - Host：
Security Studies Unit (SSU), Institute for Future Initiatives (IFI), the University of Tokyo
Institute of Social Science, The University of Tokyo
- Language：
English (Japanese simultaneous translation not available)
- Registration：
Please be sure to sign up from registration form below.
＊This event is part of the UTokyo-Cambridge Voices series of conversations held between researchers from
the two universities regarding a specific aspect of their research.*The Institute for Future Initiatives (IFI) and Institute of Social Science collect personal information in order to provide you with the event URL and information about our current and future activities. Your personal information will not be disclosed to any third party.
Why are some international systems characterized by stable multipolarity while others are conquered to form universal empires? This paper explains systemic variation through a comparison of early modern Europe (the persistence of multipolar anarchy after a failed Ottoman challenge) and greater China (empire after Manchu conquest). Both the Ottomans and the Manchus successfully hybridized steppe and sedentary military techniques that gave them the requisite material capabilities to potentially become “world conquerors.” Nevertheless, the decisive factor explaining these divergent systemic outcomes was the Ottomans’ and Manchus’ differential success in surmounting the legitimation gradient of conquest. The Manchus were more successful than the Ottomans in using cultural statecraft to prevent balancing coalitions, and to encourage bandwagoning and collaboration. Cultural statecraft comprised strategies of co-opting pre-existing symbols of imperial rule, and employing multivocal legitimacy strategies to sequentially appeal to multiple segmented audiences. Multipolar anarchy is thus a contingent outcome in international politics, rather than a constant, which can be extinguished by militarily powerful and culturally agile “world conquerors.”
• Speaker: Jason Sharman (Sir Patrick Sheehy Professor of International Relations, University of Cambridge)
• Discussant: Yee Kuang Heng (Professor, Graduate school of Public Policy, the University of Tokyo)
• Moderator: MUKOYAMA Naosuke (Associate Professor, Institute for Future Initiatives, the University of Tokyo)